Argentina’s Deregulation Plan Unveiled Dec 2, 2025

Argentina’s Deregulation Plan Unveiled

 
Unlock the future of economic freedom—discover how Dr Sturzenegger is tearing down red tape and reshaping Argentina’s bureaucratic landscape

Step Inside the Engine Room of Reform – Live at Diligentia with Argentina’s Minister of Deregulation, Federico Sturzenegger

Discover how bold policy meets real-world impact in this exclusive event featuring one of Latin America’s most influential reformers. Minister Federico Sturzenegger will take the stage to unveil the strategies behind Argentina’s ambitious push to dismantle red tape, modernize government, and unlock economic dynamism.

Whether you’re a policymaker seeking actionable reforms, a business leader navigating international markets, or simply fascinated by the machinery of government transformation—this is your front-row seat to change in motion.

Seats are limited. Reserve now and be part of the conversation reshaping the future of governance.

The Israel Wedge: The Secret Strategy of America’s Enemies to Undermine the Trump Administration.

Washington DC; Hosted by the Gold Institute for International Strategy, this virtual briefing brings together leading voices to examine how adversaries of the United States are working to weaken the U.S.–Israel alliance, and why defending that partnership remains vital to America’s strategic strength.

Panelists:
Moderator: Eli M. Gold, President, Gold Institute for International Strategy
Congressman Trent Franks, Distinguished Fellow
Adam Lovinger, Vice President of Strategic Affairs
Saul Montes-Bradley, Vice President of Communications

The discussion explores Israel’s broad contributions to the United States in research and development, biotechnology, agriculture, defense, and intelligence. Congressman Franks highlights the critical role of Israeli defense systems such as the Iron Dome and their partnership potential for the U.S. Adam Lovinger examines how America’s enemies exploit Western institutions to erode support for Israel, while Saul Montes-Bradley addresses emerging trends in media and social platforms that shape public perception.

Moderator Eli M. Gold underscores the need to challenge disinformation and strengthen understanding of Israel’s value as a democratic ally and strategic partner. Together, the panel offers a powerful conversation designed to restore balance to the public debate.

Cyber Experts Roundtable, Nov 6, 2025

CYBER EXPERTS ROUNDTABLE

This roundtable aims to gather leaders across the public and private sectors to discuss vital issues involving strategy, policy, operations, risk management, partnerships, and workforce development for cyber and digital transformation.

 Date: November 6, 2025
 Time: 10am–2pm EST
 Location: The Homer Building, Washington, DC 20005


Featured Speakers:

  • Lieutenant General (Ret.) Michael Flynn
    GIS Chairman

  • Dr. Chris Porter
    Head of International Security Cooperation at Google Cloud

  • Rear Admiral (Ret.) Mark Montgomery
    Senior Director, Center on Cyber and Technology Innovation at FDD
    Former Head of the Cyberspace Solarium Commission

  • Dr. Reuben Egolf
    Co-founder and Managing Partner, United States Council on Global Development

  • Brian Harrell
    Former Assistant Secretary for Infrastructure Protection (DHS)


Special Guests and Organizations Invited:

  • White House National Cyber Director

  • Office of the Secretary of War (Cyber and Space)

  • ODNI

  • FBI

  • DHS (CISA and Assistant Secretary for CIRRI)

  • U.S. House Subcommittee Chair for Government Oversight on Cyber, IT, and Innovation

  • Foreign partners


The roundtable will also discuss plans for a Spring 2026 Maritime and Port Cybersecurity Tabletop Exercise in Hampton Roads, Virginia.


Hosted by:

The Gold Institute for International Strategy

 Speakers include:

  • Jeff Hoffman, Senior Cyber Fellow

  • Eli Gold, President

📧 For more information, contact:
jeff@cipsolutions.org

The Role Of Independent Media in International Affairs, Washington D.C. Oct 30th

The Gold Institute for International Strategy presents:

The Role Of Independent Media in International Affairs, Washington D.C.

October 30th: 10am-2pm
Roundtable discussions followed by team break-out sessions

Last day to buy tickets Wednesday, October 29, 2025 11:59 PM, EDT

The Gold Institute for International Strategy will offer a premier platform for fostering, analyzing and disseminating actionable insights on the role of alternative media relevant to national and international affairs.

National Security Strategy

The purpose of this National Security Strategy (NSS) is to identify three strategically significant but neglected threats and opportunities that directly impact U.S. national security long-term. The first is an “uncomfortable truth” for much of official Washington. America’s authoritarian adversaries have infiltrated and subverted from within every key American government agency and institution. This is not a new phenomenon, but the current depth, breadth, and ferocity of such is unprecedented. The underappreciated reason for this is that, unlike during the Cold War, America’s authoritarian adversaries see their transformation of America into an authoritarian regime, like them, as a matter of life-or-death for their continued survival.

The second neglected threat addressed by this NSS is another uncomfortable truth. It is a byproduct, or natural consequence, of the aforementioned ideological infiltration of our government and institutions. Today, a significant percentage of America’s most senior leaders, including government and military officials, have adopted Beijing’s and Moscow’s strategic objectives for America as their own. This has resulted in a level of U.S. policy convergence with Beijing and Moscow that is weakening the U.S. and its allies while strengthening our strategic adversaries.

The third threat addressed by this NSS is a natural outgrowth of the second. Like America, most of our democratic allies face a plague of foreign adversary internal subversion. Given this common threat, instead of each ally addressing it alone, we should confront it together and see this shared, persistent, threat as an opportunity to professionalize the crafting and execution of alliance strategy against these and other challenges to our alliances.

Read More

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: General Mike Flynn Joins Gold Institute for International Strategy as Chairman

Washington, D.C. March 12, 2025 – The Gold Institute for International Strategy (GIIS) is proud to announce the appointment of General Mike Flynn as its new Chairman. With an illustrious military career spanning over three decades and extensive experience in national security and intelligence, General Flynn brings invaluable leadership and strategic insight to the Institute.

General Flynn, a retired United States Army Lieutenant General, served as National Security Advisor to President Donald Trump. He also served as the 18th Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and was instrumental in shaping U.S. counterterrorism strategies during his tenure. His military accolades include numerous awards such as the Defense Superior Service Medal and recipient of four Bronze Star Metals, highlighting his commitment to national security and excellence in service. He is considered a subject matter expert in Diplomacy, Statecraft, Foreign Policy, Strategy Formulation, Defense, Intelligence, and other areas of national and international security. He served more than 33 years in the Army, Joint, and Special Operations Forces, with multiple overseas combat tours.

He is the author of 7 books, two are best sellers. He holds three master’s degrees, an honorary doctorate and currently serves as the Chairman of America’s Future, which is among the nation’s oldest non-profits.

In his role at the Gold Institute, General Flynn will lead initiatives aimed at addressing pressing global security challenges, fostering strategic alliances, and promoting effective policy solutions. The GIIS is dedicated to enhancing understanding of complex international issues and providing actionable insights to policymakers.

“Eli Gold created, from scratch, an Institute that seeks to promote ideas as well as idealism and to connect disparate communities for a common purpose. That purpose is to establish the Gold Institute for International Strategy as a leader in a global conversation to achieve peace and prosperity by bringing a sense of realism combined with creative policy solutions to solve some of the biggest problems. I am honored to have been part of GIIS from the beginning.” ~ General Mike Flynn

General Flynn added, “In an era marked by evolving threats and geopolitical complexities, it is vital that we work collaboratively to strengthen our national security and international partnerships. I look forward to engaging with our team of experts and contributing to meaningful discussions that will shape the future of global strategy.”

Under General Flynn’s leadership, the GIIS aims to further its mission of delivering practical solutions to contemporary security concerns while advocating for the values that underpin democratic societies.

Eli M. Gold, President of the Gold Institute, expressed enthusiasm about the appointment: “General Flynn’s extensive experience and strategic vision will be pivotal as we navigate the intricacies of international relations. His leadership will enhance our efforts to address critical challenges facing our nation and allies.”

The Gold Institute for International Strategy looks forward to General Flynn’s contributions as it continues its commitment to fostering informed dialogue on national security issues.

About the Gold Institute for International Strategy

Founded in 2019, the Gold Institute for International Strategy is a nonprofit organization based in Washington, D.C., focused on key aspects of U.S. foreign policy and national security. The Institute engages with policymakers, military leaders, and scholars to provide insights and recommendations on pressing global challenges.

For more information about General Flynn’s appointment or the Gold Institute for International Strategy, please contact us at info@goldiis.org or visit www.Goldiis.org.

China’s Rising Influence in the South China Sea: Implications for ASEAN and Global Stability

Evolving security dynamics in the South China Sea reveal a dangerous and highly volatile mix of aggressive posturing, legal defiance, and strategic manipulation.

As China increasingly asserts its claims over the fraught seascape and the vast mineral wealth lying underneath, the United States continues to demonstrate a military presence of its own, strengthening its relations with India and several ASEAN member states to bolster its position. Complicating this scenario even further are lingering fears that China will materialize a non-consensual unification with Taiwan within the next five years — an invasion that promises devastating losses to both sides.

The strategic importance of the South China Sea cannot be overstated: whoever controls it, controls the future of East Asia. With an estimated $3.37 trillion of goods – nearly 21% of all global trade – transiting annually, this body of water is not just a regional flashpoint, but a crucial economic lifeline.

Last year, Chinese Premier Li Qiang warned that misperceptions, diverging interests, and external interferences may give rise to a “new Cold War” in the region. As these tensions continue to grow, it is not simply the future of one of the world’s most vital maritime corridors that hangs in the balance, but the stability of the world order itself.

To download this paper Click Here.

Retired Army General: ‘Somebody Failed to Appreciate the Militarily Significant Aspects of Terrain’

IMAGE: Layout of the Butler Farm Show fairgrounds, Butler, Pa., where a sniper fired several shots at President Donald J. Trump, and hit his right ear, during his July 13, 2024, rally there. The shooter was roughly 150 yards away from Trump, and to the left of the president and Secret Service counter-snipers. (RedState graphic by Neil W. McCabe from Google Earth image)

(This article first appeared in RedState.com: https://redstate.com/mccabe/2024/07/14/retired-army-general-somebody-failed-to-appreciate-the-militarily-significant-aspects-of-terrain-n2176868)

By: Neil W. McCabe, Media Fellow

The retired Army general officer who led Kurdish Peshmerga guerilla troops in Iraq and who now serves as a senior staffer for a Florida congressman told RedState, as a military man, the Secret Service must look at what went wrong before the July 13 assassination attempt on President Donald J. Trump.

“They’ve got to do an absolutely serious after-action review, not just for their sake, not just for the sake of any future presidents, but the sake of this country,” said Brig. Gen. Ernest C. Audino, who was commissioned as a second lieutenant upon his graduation from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, N.Y.

“They got to figure out where the failures occurred, and it’s got to be an honest after-action or review—no thin skins—and if you fouled up, own up to it because there were failures along the way,” said the general, who is a senior military fellow at the Washington-based Gold Institute for International Strategies.

“My hypothesis is somebody failed to appreciate the militarily significant aspects of terrain,” he said.

Audino said it is his contingent assessment that mistakes made before the rally led to a potential catastrophe affecting the American political system and the world’s geopolitical stability.

Audino: The terrain tells you where threats can make you vulnerable

The general said that the Army has a process for making threat assessments that would have produced for the Secret Service personnel a limited set of locations where a hostile actor could attack the president.

He said the Army calls the battlespace analysis process OAKOC for obstacles, avenues of approach, key terrain, observation and fields of fire, and cover and concealment.

“Without any other information right now, my guess is there were likely failures during the planning and reconnaissance phase,” said the former director of nuclear support for the Defense Threat Reduction Agency.

“When they received the mission, they should have initiated the reconnaissance out to the area, and someone should have been going through this checklist,” he said.

He said the first item on the checklist is determining the no-go areas on the terrain. These are the places where no one would or could go.

Security personnel next need to figure out the avenues of approach or the go-terrain, he said.

Then, they must determine which pieces of terrain along the avenues of approach that offer advantage to the hostile actor—that’s your key terrain, he said.

Among the sites of key terrain on the Butler Farm Show fairgrounds were the rooftops, Audino added.

“We can say all of those high points in the area like those rooftops, and there weren’t many of them, so it’s not like they were overwhelmed by the sheer number of rooftops. There were only a few that were relevant to the area of operation,” he noted.

Once you have identified key terrain, such as the rooftops in Butler, the military mindset is to determine how the hostile actor could attack, he said.

Audino: Why weren’t the rooftops secured?

“Where could an enemy achieve observation and fields of fire that’s relevant to the mission of this event that’s coming up?” he asked.

Throughout the interview, Audino kept returning to the rooftops, and where a hostile actor could be concealed.

“Once you’ve identified the key terrains, avenues to the terrain, and places in the terrain where the hostile actor could observe his targets and conceal himself, the Soldier is left with a finite set of locations to be secured,” he said.

He said that then you have to find areas where a hostile actor or threat could find cover and concealment.

“Once you’ve identified those areas, then you’ve got to secure them some way,” he continued.

“Why was there no presence on that rooftop or near that rooftop? Why was there no effective fire over watching that rooftop?” he asked.

The general said he understood that security personnel were in position, but they did not stop the attack.

“Was it that they weren’t alert, or they had other sectors they were watching?” he asked.

“There are times when the hostile actor has the advantage because he has initiative, but terrain analysis helps you identify his most likely courses of action,” he said. “But you never have perfect knowledge.”

One factor in the Butler shooting is that law enforcement has a different culture and different processes, he explained.

“From my perspective, the law enforcement mindset is investigatory,” he said.

“It’s a different analysis at some level, first before anything else, the military is looking to destroy the enemy,” he said. “The military is looking across the military aspects of terrain, and they’re accounting for what they know, what they don’t know and what they think.”

“The military approach is to figure out the possible source of threats and how to neutralize the threats,” he said.


Audino: Risk assessment must consider the cost of failure

“In a military operation, the Soldier conducts his risk assessment along with calculating what risks are acceptable and what risks are not acceptable,” the general said.

“We could very well find out that this Secret Service detail wasn’t resourced by the Secret Service commensurate with the threat.”

“Certainly,” he continued, “the assassination of Trump was an unacceptable risk, which meant all the planning had to consider the cost of failure.”

“The threat is significantly higher on this presidential candidate as a former president than virtually any other presidential candidate in history.”

“It’s hard to say much risk here is acceptable because the risk of failure is so high,” the general warned.

“I saw somebody just made a comment publicly that we were one inch away from a civil war–I mean, maybe that’s a stretch, but maybe it’s not.”

Neil W. McCabe is a Washington-based journalist and media consultant. He is a senior NCO in the Army Reserve and Iraq War veteran. Follow him on Twitter: @neilwmccabe2 GETTR/TruthSocial: @ReporterMcCabe

Eli Gold: Is the Pentagon’s Gaza Pier Just a New Way to Deliver Supplies to Hamas?

This article first appeared on RedState.com – https://redstate.com/mccabe/2024/05/17/eli-gold-is-the-pentagons-gaza-pier-just-a-new-way-to-deliver-supplies-to-hamas-n2174339

The founder and president of the Washington-based Gold Institute for International Strategies told RedState he is skeptical about whether the Pentagon’s maritime corridor for Gazan humanitarian aid will improve the conditions for the civilians living there.

We have all seen the videos of Hamas snipers sitting on top of the trucks—and as people are trying to get near the trucks, they shoot them,” said Eli M. Gold, who founded the Gold Institute five years ago after serving as a senior vice president at The London Center for Policy Research.

“What makes anyone believe this won’t happen just because the aid is coming across a pier that the United States built–because God knows the effectiveness of the United States’ humanitarian efforts in the Middle East,” Gold said.

The problem is that aid is coming in, but Hamas has diverted it to support their resistance to the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF), instead of distributing it to the general population, he said.

“There’s no evidence to suggest that Hamas will not usurp this aid as they have done with all of the aid coming from Egypt, Israel, or anywhere else until now,” he said.

“In fact, we may have just opened up another way to deliver supplies to Hamas instead of getting it to the Palestinians in need,” Gold said.

“Once there, there is no security of the aid that’s coming across this pier, right?” he said.

Gold, who regularly advises members of Congress and their staffers, said no one is impressed when he talks to people in Washington about the Gaza pier.

“The response that I get from most people is another roll-your-eyes at this effort, which will provide no fruit whatsoever,” he said.

Cooper touts the Pentagon’s success in establishing maritime aid corridor to Gaza

The deputy commander of U.S. Central Command told reporters Thursday that the Pentagon has established its floating pier on the Gazan shore, opening up a new channel for U.S. aid to flow to that war-torn region.

“Let me be absolutely clear: The U.S. military’s only role in this effort is to provide our unique logistics capability to enable the delivery of lifesaving humanitarian aid to the people of Gaza by USAID and our international partners,” said Vice Admiral Bradley Cooper, a 1989 graduate of the U.S. Naval Academy at Annapolis, Maryland.

“International efforts are underway to increase the flow of humanitarian aid to the people of Gaza through all available routes, including by land, by air, and now by sea,” said Cooper.

“We are focused on flooding the zone with humanitarian assistance. This is the policy of our government,” he said.

The career surface warfare officer said the floating pier, officially called the Joint Logistics Over-the-Shore, or JLOTS, completes a triad of channels for flowing humanitarian support.

“To complement the provision of aid through land routes, which we know is the most efficient and effective pathway to move the necessary volume of assistance,” the admiral said. “We are pursuing multiple methods to deliver aid into Gaza, from the air and now from the sea.”

The admiral said the maritime corridor is ready to go, with ships standing off in the Mediterranean prepared to bring in the aid.

“I think we’re going to get about 500 tons in the next couple of days. That’s a pretty substantial amount, and it’s spread out over multiple ships right now,” Cooper said.

“We’ve got thousands of tons in the pipeline,” he said.

The floating pier, also known as a trident pier, is 1,600 feet long and is estimated to have cost $320 million.

In a May 7 Pentagon briefing, Deputy Press Secretary Sabrina Singh said the workhorse vessel bringing humanitarian aid to the floating pier is slated to be the 25-foot beam container ship Sagamore, whose route will be the 360-mile round-trip between Gaza and the logistics staging station at Cyprus.

Singh said Army soldiers assembled the floating pier at sea, although there were weather delays.

The humanitarian aid in Cyprus will travel from Cyprus to a temporary floating pier several miles off the coast of Gaza, Singh said. There, at sea, cargo will be unloaded from the Sagamore onto trucks that are onboard Army-owned landing craft utility ships, or LCUs, and logistic support vessels, or LSVs.

Singh said that the Army ships are set to travel toward Gaza, where they will meet up with the trident pier.

The trucks onboard the LCUs and LSVs will drive onto the pier and onto the shore of Gaza, where the humanitarian aid supplies can then be staged for delivery inside Gaza, she said.

Neil W. McCabe is a Washington-based journalist and media consultant. He is a senior NCO in the Army Reserve and Iraq War veteran. Follow him on Twitter: @neilwmccabe2 GETTR/TruthSocial: @ReporterMcCabe

“Making Europe Great Again”

In Bucharest, Romania, on 26-27 April 2024, politicians, think-tankers, businessmen, writers and influencers from across Europe, the United States, Canada and South America gathered for a conference on defending European values and freedom and restoring national self-confidence. In other words, “Making Europe Great Again”. It was organized by the Romanian conservative political party, Alliance for the Union of Romanians (AUR), ahead of elections for the European Parliament to be held in all 27 countries of the European Union during the period 6-9 June 2024. Once elected, some 700 new members of the European Parliament (MEPs) will travel to Strasbourg on 16 July where most of them will join one of 8 trans-national political groups spanning a spectrum from Left to Right, from communist to extreme nationalist. The AUR aims to join the center-right group of European Conservatives & Reformists.

On 27 April, Geoffrey Van Orden CBE, Gold Institute Distinguished Fellow, Former British Army Brigadier-General, and leader of the British Conservatives in the European Parliament (before the United Kingdom left the EU in 2020), delivered a speech based on the following.

“30 years as a British Army officer taught me to keep my eye on the main aim, not to bring problems but solutions, and to understand the enemy. This also proved useful in my 20 years in the European Parliament, where I stood up for the sovereignty of our nations and against the drive for political integration, led the opposition to the EU’s misguided defense policy, demanded revitalization of NATO and rigorous counter-terrorism policies and sounded the alarm over mass immigration.

Today I see our values and our way of life are under threat and yet we are like rabbits caught in the car headlights, unable to make the right move. We face massive external and internal challenges, but we seem to have lost our way.

There is no doubt that the Covid pandemic inflicted the most enormous economic and social costs on all of us. There are worries about climate change and about conflict. But we have been through worse.

What is different is the widespread mood of pessimism and the undermining of confidence in our nations and our institutions, particularly among young people. This mood is spread by social media and fed by deliberate disinformation coming from Russia and its allies.

This is the backdrop to the most immediate and urgent threat that unfolded just a few miles from here with the Russian attack on the Ukraine, aiming to recreate the failed Soviet Union and that old Russian sphere of influence that embraced eastern Europe and the Black Sea. Romania’s commitment as a vital NATO ally was never more important.

Not only must we give every possible support to Ukraine in her defense against aggression, but the West needs to rearm – to upgrade national military capabilities, and strengthen the NATO alliance and our defense industries.

I am reassured that the United Kingdom is leading the way in Europe with the announcement, just a few days ago, of increasing defense expenditure and a massive replenishment of weapons for Ukraine.

Romania is enhancing its naval capabilities with four new surface combatants and three submarines for operations in the Black Sea. It is deepening its relationship with NATO and hosting NATO’s newest regional headquarters, Multinational Division Southeast.

Russia, with a GDP smaller than Britain’s, is single-minded in its objectives, seeking to recover its great power status and aggressively trying to restore its control of the post- Soviet space. Its people are used to hardship. The citizens of the democracies, meanwhile, seek a world of stability and just want peace, comfort and the good life.

Moscow’s strategy is two-fold. Firstly to convince Western public opinion to appease Russia in order to avoid conflict. Secondly, to separate Europe from the United States – to break the transatlantic alliance that has been our saviour and protection for over 80 years.

This is why I believe that EU Defense Policy, essentially a 70-year old French project, aiming to create an autonomous EU defense structure, separate from NATO – is not only wrong-headed but dangerous.

We are constantly being told that America is turning its back on Europe, pivoting to Asia, and that Donald Trump, in particular, wants to take America out of NATO. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Every American president since Eisenhower has wanted the Europeans to contribute more to their own security. Trump just speaks in more brash language. The fact is, he has been a major incentive for the Europeans to do more – two-thirds of NATO’s 32 members now spend at least 2% of their GDP on defense. Ten years ago, only 3 NATO allies met that meagre target.

The United States now has more troops and equipment stationed in Europe than since the end of the Cold War. It is investing some $5 billion in the European Deterrence Initiative, and in the last few days, the US Congress has approved a $60 billion defense assistance program for Ukraine. It has deployed a rotational Brigade Combat Team to Romania in addition to air and air defense assets. That’s a massive, continuing, and reliable commitment to European security by the United States. And it’s what Russia fears most.

What we need across Europe is more military capability backed by political will, not fanciful EU structures.

The EU is not “Europe”.

The fact is EU defense policy has never been about more military capability – it is a political project to take forward European political integration. Brussels now wants the national veto on EU defense policy to be lifted and to introduce majority voting so that it can impose its political will. And it wants to insist on exclusive EU defense procurement, which by definition would complicate and exclude non-EU providers like the US and UK. You may recall Madeleine Albright’s warning way back in in 1998, against EU Defense Policy. She saw that it would lead to “diminution of NATO, discrimination and duplication” – the famous 3 “Ds”. Unfortunately all of them are hallmarks of EU Defense Policy. This needs to be opposed.

The transatlantic alliance needs to be strengthened, not chopped in half.

We also face an enemy within. The hard Left has never lost its loathing for our nations, for our great histories, culture and traditions, for all that has made us who we are. It will do all that it can to disrupt our economies, target vital industries, and create fear and despair.

We see it in action on our streets with the demonstrations ostensibly about Gaza. Noticeably absent is any condemnation of the Hamas terror organisation, any demands for the release of Israeli hostages, or even puzzlement at the abject failure of successive Palestinian leaders to deliver peace for their people.

And we have another problem. We are incapable, it seems, of securing our borders. Week after week, year after year, we allow countless thousands of strangers into our countries from cultures entirely different to our own. Their sheer numbers make integration into our societies increasingly difficult and now, with the promotion of multiculturalism, we seem to have given up on that possibility.

Last year, net migration to the UK was 672,000. In 2022, net migration to the EU countries was over 4 million.

The EU, wrapped in faulty human rights legislation, has been a massive magnet for migrants. Its mind-set is to continue to lay our countries open but to impose migrant quotas on its member states. Quite rightly, many EU countries have refused to accept this. But it is national governments that have been complacent over mass immigration or have sat at the EU Council table in Brussels and agreed on rules that merely encourage more migration.

At the same time, new laws have been introduced which give unprecedented protection to imported sensitivities and beliefs so that it is now hardly possible to criticize the arrival of people from entirely different cultures and backgrounds in case we are called racist or Islamophobic.

Not surprisingly we now have a generation of young people who know little about their own countries and are being indoctrinated into shame over our great national stories through social media, schools and universities as well as public institutions such as our art galleries and museums.

Let us be clear, most migrants come because they want to integrate into our societies, earn a living, and leave behind the system they grew up with. Many have made a great contribution to our societies and are proud of the country that has adopted them. But the pressure on so many to retain their old cultural baggage and loyalties is enormous.

We have to put a stop to mass immigration before it gets worse. Within the EU, national governments need to regain control over asylum and immigration policy. We need to change welfare and employment systems and human rights legislation that is a massive magnet for migrants. Those that enter our countries illegally or engage in serious criminality must be removed.

One of the biggest obstacles to an effective removal system across Europe has proved to be the European Convention on Human Rights – or rather its overreach and inflated interpretation. Its workings, along with the Refugee Convention, impact on all of our countries.

Neither the United States, nor the United Kingdom nor so many other countries, have any need of an external court in order to protect their very long-standing and positive record of human rights. International laws were drawn up in entirely different circumstances over 70 years ago, after the atrocities of the holocaust and with the communist iron curtain falling across eastern Europe. We now need a concerted effort to change these Conventions and their interpretation.

Increase in defense expenditure, enhancement of NATO, control of our borders and an end to mass immigration – these are policies that our center-right parties should campaign for.

15 years ago, I was instrumental in the creation of the European Conservatives & Reformists political group in the European Parliament. I want to see it again becoming the third largest group in the parliament and a decisive force. It is time the sensible, reasonable, center-right reasserted itself.

We must strengthen the cohesion of our nations, educate our young people about the reality of the threat we face, and carry out a moral rearmament to restore confidence and hope. Our democracy and prosperity, has been hard won over many centuries, but can be easily lost. It would take many generations to recover.

Europe – the United Kingdom, the Nordic countries, the Black Sea nations, the continental European countries – have much in common and have contributed so much to the world. We are a bastion of freedom, democracy, and the rule of law. We have been an engine of global creativity and prosperity. Let us show that we are proud of who we are and that, along with our great kindred allies, the United States, Canada, and so many others, we have the resolve and the resources to protect our precious inheritance of freedom and to make a better world.”